The question isn't "Can AI do this?"
It's "How much should I trust AI to do this?"
Trust engineering is the practice of systematically deciding how much autonomy to grant agents based on task characteristics, not gut feeling.
Trust Levels Framework
No Trust
Human does everything. AI is informational only.
Draft Mode
AI suggests, human executes. Human reviews before any action.
Review Mode
AI executes, human approves. Pre-execution confirmation required.
Autonomous Mode
AI executes, human audits. Post-execution review.
Self-Improving
AI optimizes its own processes. Human sets boundaries.
How to Calibrate Trust
Four factors to evaluate for any task:
Reversibility
Can this action be undone easily?
Blast Radius
How much could go wrong?
Verification Speed
How quickly can I verify the output?
Agent Track Record
How often has this agent succeeded at this task?
Calibration Examples
How I calibrate trust for common tasks:
| Task | Trust Level | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Fix typo in README | 3 | Low risk, easily verified, fully reversible |
| Refactor authentication flow | 1 | High blast radius, security-critical, needs careful review |
| Generate test data | 2 | Medium risk, should verify data quality before use |
| Send email to client | 1 | Irreversible, reputation risk, human must review |
| Format code with Prettier | 3 | Deterministic, easily reversible, well-tested tool |
| Write database migration | 1 | Potentially destructive, requires domain knowledge review |
The Fundamental Principle
Trust is not binary. It's a dial, not a switch.
Start with lower trust. Increase based on evidence.
The mistake: Giving agents too much autonomy too quickly, then losing trust entirely when they fail.
The solution: Progressive trust building. Let agents earn autonomy through repeated success.
Trust engineering is how I manage my own agent systems.